The relationship between some Liouville theorems on Riemannian manifolds of a special type (Q1277447): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 03:47, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The relationship between some Liouville theorems on Riemannian manifolds of a special type
scientific article

    Statements

    The relationship between some Liouville theorems on Riemannian manifolds of a special type (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    27 April 1999
    0 references
    Let \(M\) be a complete Riemannian manifold and let \(\Delta = \sum_{ij} g^{ij} ({\partial \over \partial x^i} {\partial \over \partial x^j} - \sum_k\Gamma_{ij}^k {\partial \over \partial x^k})\) be the Laplace-Beltrami operator acting on functions. We say that \(M\) satisfies the Liouville theorem (L1) if every bounded solution \(u\) of \(\Delta u = 0\) is constant. Moreover, we say that \(M\) satisfies (L2) if the equation \(\Delta u = \mu u\) has no nontrivial bounded solutions for all \(\mu > 0\). Euclidean space \(M={\mathbb R}^n\) satisfies both (L1) and (L2). Now let \(M\) be the union \(M = B \cup D\) where \(B\) is a compact set and \(D\) is diffeomorphic to \((0,\infty)\times S\), \(S\) compact, and \(D\) carries a warped product metric. The main result of the paper states that for such \(M\) (L1) implies (L2). The converse is not true as one can see from the example of hyperbolic space.
    0 references
    0 references
    Liouville theorem
    0 references
    Riemannian manifold
    0 references
    Laplace equation
    0 references