Erratum: Conjunctions, disjunctions, and Bell-type inequalities in orthoalgebras (Q1303402): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 03:51, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Erratum: Conjunctions, disjunctions, and Bell-type inequalities in orthoalgebras
scientific article

    Statements

    Erratum: Conjunctions, disjunctions, and Bell-type inequalities in orthoalgebras (English)
    0 references
    13 January 2000
    0 references
    [Erratum to the author's paper, ibid. 35, No. 11, 2353-2363 (1996; Zbl 0868.03027).] The published version of Theorem 3 does not hold true in general. The mistake in the proof of this theorem consists in unjustified identification of elements \(\widetilde a\), \(\widetilde b\) that appear in the Mackey decomposition of a pair \((a,b)\) with different, in general, elements \(\widetilde a^*\), \(\widetilde b^*\) that appear in Mackey decompositions of pairs \((a,c)\) and \((a,d)\) when \(c\neq b\) and \(d\neq a\). The correct version of Theorem 3 is as follows: Theorem 3. Let \(L\) be an orthoalgebra with the UMD property and let \(a_1 Ca_2 Ca_3\cdots a_n Ca_1\), i.e., \(a_1,a_2,\dots, a_n\) be ``circularly compatible'' elements of \(L\). If \(p\) is a state which is dispersion-free on a pair \((a_i, a_{i+1})\), then the following generalized Bell-type inequality holds: \[ \sum_{\substack{ k=1,\dots,n\\ k\neq i}} S_p(a_k, a_{k+1})\geq S_p(a_i, a_{i+1}),\tag{7} \] where we put \(a_{n+1}= a_1\).
    0 references
    axiomatic quantum mechanics
    0 references
    hidden-variables theory
    0 references
    Mackey decomposition
    0 references
    orthoalgebra
    0 references
    generalized Bell-type inequality
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers