Regularity of refinable function vectors (Q1361402): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 03:04, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Regularity of refinable function vectors
scientific article

    Statements

    Regularity of refinable function vectors (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2 June 1999
    0 references
    Compactly supported solutions of refinement equations \(\phi(x)=\sum_{n=0}^N P_n\phi(2x-n)\) are considered for vector valued functions \(\phi\) and constant square matrices \(P_n\). As in the scalar case, the smoothness of \(\phi\) and the decay of the Fourier transform \(\widehat{\phi}\) are characterized by properties of the refinement mask \(P(u)={1\over 2}\sum_n P_ne^{-inu}\). In the scalar case, the approximation order can only be \(m\) if \(P(u)\) factors as \([(1+e^{-iu})/2]^mP^{(m)}(u)\) where \(P^{(m)}\) is \(2\pi\)-periodic, and \(P^{(m)}(0)=1\). The factorization property needed in the vector case is however much more involved: a factorization of the form \[ P(u)=2^{-m}C_0(2u)\cdots C_{m-1}(2u) P^{(m)}(u) C_{m-1}(u)^{-1}\cdots C_0(u)^{-1} \] is needed. From the relation \(\widehat{\phi}(u)=P(u/2)\widehat{\phi}(u/2)\), one gets the well-known infinite product representation of \(\widehat{\phi}\). The convergence of the infinite product in the matrix case is again much more intricate than in the scalar case and needs more conditions on \(P(u)\), for example \(P(0)\) should be diagonalizable with spectral radius at most 1. Finally, some conditions are needed to make \(\widehat{\phi}(u)\) decay for \(| u| \to\infty\). These decay properties allow to prove uniqueness of the solution of the refinement equations in a large function class and also the convergence of the cascade and subdivision algorithm can be derived. Several examples illustrate these results. The scaling functions of \textit{G. C. Donovan, J. S. Geronimo, D. P. Hardin} and \textit{P. R. Massopust} [SIAM J. Math. Anal. 27, No. 4, 1158-1192 (1996; Zbl 0873.42021)] are a special case.
    0 references
    refinable function vectors
    0 references
    refinable mask
    0 references
    Fourier transform
    0 references
    spectral radius
    0 references
    wavelets
    0 references
    refinement equations
    0 references
    scaling functions
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references