Stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property (Q1383290): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set profile property. |
||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 03:11, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property |
scientific article |
Statements
Stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property (English)
0 references
14 April 1998
0 references
Summary: We show that there exists a \(C^*\)-algebra \(B\) such that \(M_2(B)\) is stable, but \(B\) is not stable. Hence stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property. More generally, we find for each integer \(n\geq 2\) a \(C^*\)-algebra \(B\) so that \(M_n(B)\) is stable and \(M_k(B)\) is not stable when \(1< k< n\). The \(C^*\)-algebras we exhibit have the additional properties that they are simple, nuclear and of stable rank one. The construction is similar to \textit{J. Villadsen's} construction in [``Simple \(C^*\)-algebras with perforation'', to appear in J. Funct. Anal.] of a simple \(C^*\)-algebra with perforation in its ordered \(K_0\)-group.
0 references
stable \(C^*\)-algebras
0 references
perforation in \(K_0\)
0 references
scaled ordered Abelian groups
0 references
stability of \(C^*\)-algebras is not a stable property
0 references
simple
0 references
nuclear
0 references
stable rank
0 references
simple \(C^*\)-algebra
0 references