Gauss's \(_ 2F_ 1(1)\) cannot be generalized to \(_ 2F_ 1(x)\) (Q1196839): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set profile property. |
||
| Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
| Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 04:30, 5 March 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Gauss's \(_ 2F_ 1(1)\) cannot be generalized to \(_ 2F_ 1(x)\) |
scientific article |
Statements
Gauss's \(_ 2F_ 1(1)\) cannot be generalized to \(_ 2F_ 1(x)\) (English)
0 references
16 January 1993
0 references
Using ideas of J. Wimp and R. McIntosh, it is proved that Gauss's explicit evaluation of \(_ 2F_ 1(a,b;c;1)\) cannot be generalized to \(_ 2F_ 1(a,b;c;x)\), for arbitrary \(a\), \(b\), \(c\) and \(x\). A short proof of Wimp's theorem that asserts that \(_ 3F_ 2(a,b,c;d,e;1)\) cannot be expressed in closed form is also given.
0 references
explicit evaluation
0 references
Wimp's theorem
0 references
closed form
0 references
