Universal bases and greedy algorithms for anisotropic function classes (Q1862756): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 04:58, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Universal bases and greedy algorithms for anisotropic function classes
scientific article

    Statements

    Universal bases and greedy algorithms for anisotropic function classes (English)
    0 references
    2 December 2003
    0 references
    We suggest a three-step strategy to find a good basis (dictionary) for nonlinear \(m\)-term approximation. The first step consists of solving an optimization problem of finding a near best basis for a given function class \(F\), when we optimize over a collection \({\mathbf D}\) of bases (dictionaries). The second step is devoted to finding a universal basis (dictionary) \({\mathcal D}_u\in {\mathbf D}\) for a given pair \(({\mathcal F},{\mathbf D})\) of collections: \({\mathcal F}\) of function classes and \({\mathbf D}\) of bases (dictionaries). This means that \({\mathcal D}_u\) provides near optimal approximation for each class \(F\) from a collection \({\mathcal F}\). The third step deals with constructing a theoretical algorithm that realizes near best \(m\)-term approximation with regard to \({\mathcal D}_u\) for function classes from \({\mathcal F}\). In this paper we work this strategy out in the model case of anisotropic function classes and the set of orthogonal bases. The results are positive. We construct a natural tensor-product-wavelet-type basis and prove that it is universal. Moreover, we prove that a greedy algorithm realizes near best \(m\)-term approximation with regard to this basis for all anisotropic function classes.
    0 references

    Identifiers