Are the approximate and the Clarke subgradients generically equal? (Q1900377): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 05:09, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Are the approximate and the Clarke subgradients generically equal?
scientific article

    Statements

    Are the approximate and the Clarke subgradients generically equal? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    29 April 1996
    0 references
    Two of the well-known subdifferential notions for a real-valued function \(f : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}\) -- the Clarke subdifferential \(\partial_c f(x)\) and the approximate subdifferential \(\partial_a f(x)\) of Joffe - - are compared in the present paper. Starting with the formerly proved inclusion \[ \partial_a f(x) \subseteq \partial_c f(x) \] it is observed if both sets are generically equal, either in sense of measure theory (i.e., equal on a set of full measure) or in the topological sense (i.e., equal on a dense \(G_\delta\)-set). In the one-dimensional case, positive answers are given showing that both subdifferentials are different at most on a countable set. For higher- dimensional spaces, however, the problem is more complicated. The author constructs a function for which the subdifferentials are different on a set with positive measure. In this example, the set on which the subdifferentials are equal is of positive measure, too, and a dense \(G_\delta\)-set. Hence, the question for the generic equality in topological sense remains unanswered.
    0 references
    approximate subdifferential of Joffe
    0 references
    Clarke subdifferential
    0 references
    generic equality
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references