Comparison of compact induction with parabolic induction (Q1935339): Difference between revisions

Let \(F\) be a non-Archimedean locally compact field of residual characteristic \(p\). Let \(G\) be a connected reductive \(F\)-group. Let \(K\) be a special parahoric subgroup of \(G(F)\). Choose a parabolic \(F\)-subgroup \(P\) of \(G\) with Levi decomposition \(P=MN\) in good position with respect to \(K\). Let \(C\) be an algebraically closed field of characteristic \(p\). Let \(V\) be an irreducible smooth \(C\)-representation of \(K\). This interesting paper investigates the natural intertwiner from the compact induced representation \(\text{c-Ind}_K^{G(F)}V\) to the parabolically induced representation \(\displaystyle\text{Ind}_{P(F)}^{G(F)}(\text{c-Ind}_{K\cap M(F)}^{M(F)}V_{K\cap N(F)})\). Under a regularity condition on \(V\), it is shown that the intertwiner becomes an isomorphism after localization at a specific Hecke operator. When F has characteristic 0, the group \(G\) is \(F\)-split, and the compact \(K\) is hyperspecial, the result was essentially proved by Herzig. Defining a notion of \(K\)-supersingularity for an irreducible smooth \(C\)-representation of \(G(F)\) which extends Herzig's definition for admissible irreducible representations, the authors give a list of irreducible representations which are neither supercuspidal nor \(K\)-supersingular.