Pointwise comparison of PCM and \(\Sigma \Delta \) quantization (Q1959706): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 06:22, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Pointwise comparison of PCM and \(\Sigma \Delta \) quantization
scientific article

    Statements

    Pointwise comparison of PCM and \(\Sigma \Delta \) quantization (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    7 October 2010
    0 references
    A quantitative comparison of Pulse Code Modulation (PCM) and Sigma-Delta (\(\Sigma\Delta\)) quantisation methods is made in the setting of finite frames. PCM and \(\Sigma\Delta\) are two industry-standard quantization methods, and the setting of finite frames is appropriate for a host of modern applications. Previous results for this comparison are known for upper error bounds, where \(\Sigma\Delta\) performs better in the setting of frames while PCM is optimal for orthonormal bases. The paper considers the question, whether there are signals such that the corresponding PCM error is smaller than the \(\Sigma\Delta\) error in the frame setting. It is proved that, typically, \(\Sigma\Delta\) outperforms PCM, but not always.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    frames
    0 references
    Sigma-Delta quantization
    0 references
    pulse code modulation
    0 references