Invariance of projective modules in \(\mathsf{Sup}\) under self-duality (Q2226980): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set profile property. |
||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 06:21, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Invariance of projective modules in \(\mathsf{Sup}\) under self-duality |
scientific article |
Statements
Invariance of projective modules in \(\mathsf{Sup}\) under self-duality (English)
0 references
9 February 2021
0 references
Given a unital quantale \((Q,\otimes, e)\), there exists the category \(\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\) of \textit{right unital \(Q\)-modules}, whose objects are pairs \((M,\boxdot)\), where \(M\) is a complete lattice, and \(\boxdot:M\times Q\rightarrow M\) is a map with the following four properties: (1) \((\bigvee S)\boxdot q=\bigvee_{s\in S}(s\boxdot q)\) for every \(S\subseteq M\) and every \(q\in Q\); (2) \(m\boxdot(\bigvee T)=\bigvee_{t\in T}(m\boxdot t)\) for every \(m\in M\) and every \(T\subseteq Q\); (3) \((m\boxdot q_1)\boxdot q_2=m\boxdot(q_1\otimes q_2)\) for every \(m\in M\) and every \(q_1,q_2\in Q\); and (4) \(m\boxdot e=m\) for every \(m\in M\) (see, [\textit{D. Kruml} and \textit{J. Paseka}, Handb. Algebra 5, 323--362 (2008; Zbl 1219.06016)] for more detail). In particular, if \(Q\) is the two-element quantale \(\mathsf{2}=\{\bot,\top\}\), then the category \(\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(\mathsf{2})\) is isomorphic to the category \textbf{Sup} of complete latices and join-preserving maps. If \(Q\) has additionally an involution \({}^{\prime}\), then there exists a \textit{self-duality} on the category \(\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\), i.e., a contravariant functor \(S:\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\rightarrow\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\) such that \(S\circ S=1_{\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)}\), defined on an object \((M,\boxdot)\) by \(S(M,\boxdot)=(M^{op},\boxdot^{op})\), where \(M^{op}\) is the dual complete lattice of \(M\), and \(m\boxdot^{op}q=\bigvee\{n\in M\,|\, n\boxdot q^{\prime}\leqslant m\,\}\); and on a morphism \(f:(M,\boxdot)\rightarrow(N,\boxdot)\) by \(S(f)=f^{\vdash}\), where \(f^{\vdash:}N^{op}\rightarrow M^{op}\) is the right adjoint map of \(f\) (in the sense of partially ordered sets). Based in their previous study of quantales and quantale modules in [\textit{P. Eklund} et al., Semigroups in complete lattices. Quantales, modules and related topics. Cham: Springer (2018; Zbl 1491.06001)] and the paper of \textit{I. Stubbe} [Theor. Comput. Sci. 373, No. 1--2, 142--160 (2007; Zbl 1111.68073)], who showed that projectivity in the category \(\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\) is equivalent to complete distributivity enriched over \(Q\), the present authors consider preservation of projectivity by the above-mentioned duality \(S\). More precisely, they show that if the underlying quantale \(Q\) is unital and involutive with a designated element (see Definition 4.5 for more detail), then the duality \(S\) preserves projectivity if and only if \(Q\) has a dualizing element (Theorem~4.11). The last section of the paper shows that involutive quantales from the above result are widespread, e.g., they are induced by completely distributive lattices with an order-reversing involution or by arbitrary groups. The paper is well written, provides most of its required preliminaries, and will be of interest to all the researchers studying categories enriched in quantales.
0 references
complete distributivity
0 references
complete lattice
0 references
cyclic element
0 references
dualizing element
0 references
enriched category
0 references
monoidal category
0 references
preordered set
0 references
presheaf
0 references
projective module
0 references
quantale
0 references
quantale module
0 references
totally below relation
0 references