Construction of robust frames in erasure recovery (Q2348017): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 06:48, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Construction of robust frames in erasure recovery
scientific article

    Statements

    Construction of robust frames in erasure recovery (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 June 2015
    0 references
    The paper is concerned with the problem of recovering signals from frame coefficients, specifically in situations when some coefficients are missing at unknown locations (being, for example, lost in transmission) or the coefficients are not in the original order. The authors present some explicit construction of almost robust and almost self-located frames, introduced in [\textit{D. Han} and \textit{W. Sun}, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 60, 4013--4025 (2014)]. Such systems allow the recovery of erased frame coefficients at unknown locations and the correct order of coefficients from any of their rearrangements for almost all signals. More precisely, a frame \(\{\varphi_{i}\}_{1\leqslant i\leqslant N}\) for a finite dimensional Hilbert space \(\mathcal H\) is called almost robust with respect to \(m\)-erasures if any \(f\in \mathcal H\setminus \mathcal H_{0}\) can be recovered from its frame coefficients with \(m\)-erasures at unknown locations, where \(\mathcal H_{0}\) is the union of finitely many proper subspaces of \(\mathcal H\) and therefore is of measure zero, whilst the frame is called almost self-located if the sequence of frame coefficients \(\{\langle f,\varphi_{i}\rangle\}_{1\leqslant i\leqslant N}\) can be recovered from any of its rearrangements for any \(f\in \mathcal H\setminus \mathcal H_{0}\). Two main results of the paper are the following. Let \(p_{1},\dots, p_{N}\) be \(N\) different prime numbers, where \(N-2\geqslant n\geqslant 2\). Set \(\varphi_{i}=(1,\sqrt{p_{i}},\dots, (\sqrt{p_{i}})^{n-1})^{T}\), \(1\leqslant i\leqslant N\). The first result states that \(\{\varphi_{i}\}_{1\leqslant i\leqslant N}\) is a frame for \(\mathbb R^{n}\) which is both almost self-located and almost robust with respect to \((N-n-1)\)-erasures. Let now \(M\) be an \((N-n)\times N\) matrix with \((i,j)\) entry being \((\sqrt{p_{j}})^{i-1}\). Suppose that \(g_{1},\dots, g_{n}\) form a basis for \(\mathcal N(M)=\{x: Mx=0\}\), where \(g_{i}=(a_{i,1},a_{i,2},\dots, a_{i,N})^{T}\), \(1\leqslant i\leqslant n\), and let \(\psi_{j}=(a_{1,j},a_{2,j},\dots, a_{n,j})^{T}\), \(1\leqslant j\leqslant N\). The second result states that\(\{\psi_{i}\}_{1\leqslant i\leqslant N}\) is a frame for \(\mathbb R^{n}\) which is both almost self-located and almost robust with respect to \((N-n-1)\)-erasures.
    0 references
    0 references
    robust frames
    0 references
    erasure recovery
    0 references

    Identifiers