Diagrammatics for Coxeter groups and their braid groups (Q2406850): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 07:03, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Diagrammatics for Coxeter groups and their braid groups
scientific article

    Statements

    Diagrammatics for Coxeter groups and their braid groups (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    29 September 2017
    0 references
    A group acting on a category is, roughly speaking, an assignment of a functor for each element of the group. This can be thought of as a categorification of the usual notion of a group representation. The primary goal of this paper is to give an explicit criterion for establishing a strict action of a Coxeter group or its braid group on a category, extending the Coxeter presentation of the said group. The secondary goal is to provide diagrammatic tools for the study of Coxeter groups and braid groups. For a group \(G\), let \(\Omega G\) be the monoidal category whose objects consist of the set \(G\) and the only morphisms are identity maps \(\mathrm{id}_{g}\) for each \(g\in G\). The monoidal structure on objects is given by the group structure on \(G\), and the monoidal structure on morphisms is uniquely determined. Given a category \(\mathcal{C}\), let \(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathcal{C})\) denote the monoidal category whose objects are autoequivalences of \(\mathcal{C}\) and whose morphisms are invertible natural transformations. The monoidal structure is given by composition of functors. A strict group action of \(G\) on a category \(\mathcal{C}\) is a monoidal functor \(\Omega G \rightarrow \mathrm{Aut}(\mathcal{C})\). Let \((W, S)\) be a Coxeter system and let \(B_{W}\) be the corresponding Artin braid group. Let \(\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{diag}}\) and \(\mathcal{W}_{\mathrm{diag}}\) be two appropriately defined monoidal categories (see Definition 1.14 in the paper; \(\mathcal{W}_{\mathrm{diag}}\) is simply \(\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{diag}}\) without any orientation). Then, the obvious monoidal functors \(\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{diag}} \rightarrow \Omega B_{W}\) is an equivalence of categories (Theorem 1.17) and the obvious monoidal functors \(\mathcal{W}_{\mathrm{diag}} \rightarrow \Omega W\) is an equivalence of categories (Theorem 1.20). This interesting paper is enriched by many remarks, examples and even exercises.
    0 references
    0 references
    Coxeter group, braid group
    0 references
    strict group action
    0 references
    Salvetti complex
    0 references
    \(K(\pi,1)\)-conjecture
    0 references
    Igusa pictures
    0 references
    diagrammatics.
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references