Common best proximity points: global optimization of multi-objective functions (Q2430043): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set profile property. |
||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 08:09, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Common best proximity points: global optimization of multi-objective functions |
scientific article |
Statements
Common best proximity points: global optimization of multi-objective functions (English)
0 references
5 April 2011
0 references
Given non-empty subsets \(A\) and \(B\) of a metric spare \((X, d)\), an element \(x^*\) in \(A\) is said to be a common best proximity point of the non-self-mappings \(S: A\to B\) and \(T: A\to B\) if it satisfies the condition \[ d(x^*, Sx^*)= d(x^*, Tx^*)= d(A, B)\equiv\text{inf}\{d(x, y): x\in A,\, y\in B\}. \] It is easy to see that a common best proximity point is an element at which both real-valued functions \(x\mapsto d(x, Sx)\) and \(x\mapsto d(x, Tx)\) attain a global minimum. Further, if the underlying mappings are self-mappings, a common best proximity point becomes a common fixed point. An interesting common best proximity point theorem for pairs of non-self-mappings satisfying a contraction-like condition is proved in this paper. The proved result generalizes a common fixed point theorem due to \textit{G. Jungck} [Am. Math. Mon. 83, 261--263 (1976; Zbl 0321.54025)] for pairs of communting self-mappings, which in turn gives rise to the well-known Banach contraction principle.
0 references
common optimal approximate solution
0 references
common best proximity point
0 references
common fixed point
0 references