Magnetic charges or why it is sometimes reasonable to model something mathematically that does not exist at all (Q2457883): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set profile property. |
||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 08:12, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Magnetic charges or why it is sometimes reasonable to model something mathematically that does not exist at all |
scientific article |
Statements
Magnetic charges or why it is sometimes reasonable to model something mathematically that does not exist at all (English)
0 references
23 October 2007
0 references
In the presence of currents and electric charges Maxwell equations suffer from a lack of symmetry because there are not discovered any magnetic charges (up to now?). On the other hand fictive magnetic charges can be useful in applications; an example is discussed impressively in the present paper with the aim to reduce errors in computational electromagnetics. Considering Maxwell's equations \[ (1)\quad{\vec E}_t - c^2 \nabla \times \vec B = -\frac{\vec j}{{\varepsilon}_0}, \qquad (2) \quad {\vec B}_t + \nabla \times \vec E = 0, \qquad (3) \quad \nabla \cdot \vec E = \frac{q}{{\varepsilon}_0}, \qquad (4) \quad \nabla \cdot \vec B = 0, \] the main idea is sketched in the following. The magnetic flux density \(\vec B\) can be computed from equation (2) for known electric field intensity \(\vec E\) and a given initial value for the magnetic flux density. Equation (4) is true for all times for an divergence-free initial value of the magnetic flux density because (4) can be deduced from (2) according the theorem that the divergence of the curl of any vector is identically zero. But, using numerical methods it can be that the condition of solenoidal magnetic flux density (4) is not fulfilled for all times because of discretisation and rounding errors. Thus, it is proposed to change the equations (2) and (4) to \[ {\vec B}_t + \nabla \times \vec E = - {\vec j}^M, \qquad \nabla \cdot \vec B = q^M \] with a fictive magnetic current density \({\vec j}^M\) and a fictive magnetic charge \(q^M\), that establish the above by the reviewer mentioned symmetry with the corresponding conservation relation of magnetic charge \(q^M_t + \nabla \cdot {\vec j}^M = 0\). This total magnetic charge can be written as \(q^M_t(\phi) + \nabla \cdot {\vec j}^M(\phi) = 0\) in order to reduce the number of variables in the ``symmetric'' Maxwell equations; that is necessary now. An appropriate ansatz like \(q^M(\phi) = \phi, \quad {\vec j}^M(\phi) = \phi \vec v\) (\(\vec v\) fictive velocity) or \(q^M(\phi) = \alpha \phi + \beta {\phi}_t, \quad {\vec j}^M(\phi) = - \nabla \phi\) (\(\alpha, \beta \) parameter) leads to equations which can be used such that the total magnetic charge converges to zero with time \(t\). Examples of such auxiliary equations are a linear advection equation, the heat conduction equation, the wave equation and the telegraph equation. The numerical efficiency of the different variants is discussed. The application of the method is outlined for the simulation of the Sun's surface by magnetohydrodynamic equations.
0 references
fictive magnetic charge
0 references
fictive magnetic current density
0 references
fictive velocity, fictive conservation relation of magnetic charge
0 references
error reduction in computer simulations
0 references
linear advection equation
0 references
heat conduction equation
0 references
wave equation
0 references
telegraph equation
0 references
Hodge operator
0 references
magnetohydrodynamic equations
0 references
sun surface
0 references