Integral-geometric formulas for perimeter in \(S^2\), \(H^2\) and Hilbert planes (Q2495309): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 08:20, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Integral-geometric formulas for perimeter in \(S^2\), \(H^2\) and Hilbert planes
scientific article

    Statements

    Integral-geometric formulas for perimeter in \(S^2\), \(H^2\) and Hilbert planes (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 July 2006
    0 references
    In this paper integral formulas are considered for the perimeter \(\mathcal{P}\) of a convex body \(K\), and generalized from the Euclidean plane to different planar geometries. First of all, a polar Minkowsky-type formula is derived in spherical and hyperbolic planes, where, in fact, the result holds whenever \(\partial K\) is \(C^2\), with no assumption of convexity. Further, Cauchy-type formulas are extended to Hilbert planes, and then specialized to \(H^2\), where they also imply the well-known Santaló-type Cauchy formula [\textit{L. A. Santaló}, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 51, 405--412 (1945; Zbl 0061.38005)]. The comparison between Cauchy and Minkowski forms points out that these are locally equivalent in \(E^2\), but the equivalence fails in planes of non zero constant curvature. Several formulas relating the various measures arising on \(\partial K\) are also discussed. Many interesting remarks and comments enrich the paper and enlighten the results
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Cauchy formula
    0 references
    convex body
    0 references
    Minkowski formula
    0 references
    perimeter
    0 references