Towards a theory of some unbounded linear operators on \(p\)-adic Hilbert spaces and applications (Q2569345): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 07:38, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Towards a theory of some unbounded linear operators on \(p\)-adic Hilbert spaces and applications
scientific article

    Statements

    Towards a theory of some unbounded linear operators on \(p\)-adic Hilbert spaces and applications (English)
    0 references
    18 October 2005
    0 references
    The author presents some examples of (un-)bounded operators acting on a ``\(p\)-adic Hilbert space'' \(E\). This is a free Banach-space endowed with a bilinear form satisfying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. It should be mentioned that only little is known about such structures (cf., in particular, the references to Bertin Diarra's papers in the article under review). The paper, therefore, is mainly dedicated to a study of particular examples. The question of the existence of adjoints of unbounded operators is addressed; a satisfying characterization, however, is not achieved. Motivated by the established characterization of bounded operators with adjoint, the author introduces the notion of ``an operator \(A\) which is said to have an adjoint \(A^*\) if and only if it satisfies condition (2.2)'' (cf.\ Definition 2.2 in the paper). It is, however, not proven in the sequel that this notion is necessary for the existence of an adjoint of \(A^*\) in the usual sense. This interesting question therefore remains open. The paper contains the following misprints: Proof of Proposition 2.4 (page 211, line 9): ``what we have to show'' is ``there exists a positive integer \(i\) such that...'' (quantifiers). Proof of Theorem 5.1 (last line of the proof): the conclusion ``\(A\) has norm \(1\), hence \(A\) is an isometry'' should be replaced by ``\(A-I\) has norm strict less than \(1\), therefore \(A\) is an isometry.''
    0 references
    \(p\)-adic Hilbert space
    0 references
    free Banach space
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references