Comparison of peak and RMS gains for discrete-time systems (Q1102916): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(87)90002-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2024972569 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 19:07, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Comparison of peak and RMS gains for discrete-time systems
scientific article

    Statements

    Comparison of peak and RMS gains for discrete-time systems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    A convolution system can have a frequency response which is small for all frequencies, yet still greatly amplify the peaks of signals passing through it. For finite-dimensional systems, however, we establish the simple bound \(\| h\|_ 1\leq (2n+1)\| h\|_{H^{\infty}}\), where \(\| h\|_ 1\) is the peak gain of the system, \(\| h\|_{H^{\infty}}\) is the maximum frequency response of the system, and n its dimension. The same result for continuous-time systems is due to Gohberg and Doyle and it is mentioned in ``Robust control of multivariable and large scale systems'', Final Tech. Report, Honeywell Systems and Research Center, Minneapolis, MN (1985). The bound implies that \(H^{\infty}\)-optimal controllers, which minimize the maximum of some disturbance-to-error transfer function, cannot have very large peak gains from the disturbance to error.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    RMS gain
    0 references
    peak gain
    0 references
    \(H^{\infty }\)-optimal controllers
    0 references
    0 references