Stable Higgs bundles on ruled surfaces (Q2195672): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W3037437061 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 18:11, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Stable Higgs bundles on ruled surfaces
scientific article

    Statements

    Stable Higgs bundles on ruled surfaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    27 August 2020
    0 references
    For any smooth projective variety \(X\) defined over an algebraically closed field with characteristic \(0\) an Higgs vector bundle on \(X\) is a pair \((V,\theta)\), where \(V\) is a vector bundle (or torsion-free sheaf) on \(X\), \(\theta: V\to V\otimes \Omega^1_X\) is a morphisn with the integrality condition \(\theta \wedge \theta =0\). For any polarization \(L\) on \(Y\) there are moduli space of \(L\)-stable Higgs bundles and of equivalence classes of \(L\)-semistable Higgs bundles with prescribed Chern classes. Here \(X = \mathbb{P}_C(E)\) is a ruled surface over a smooth curve \(C\) of genus \(g\ge 2\).The author proves that pull-backs \(V \to \pi^\ast(V)\) make essentially an equivalence between stable (or semistable) vector bundles on \(C\) and \(L\)-stable vector bundles on \(X\) with pull-bach \(c_1\) and \(c_2=0\). A tool is the Bogomolov inequality for semistable Higgs bundles \((V,\theta)\) (\(V\) is not necessarily semistable as abstract bundle). In particular (for these \(c_1\)'s and \(c_2=0\) and any rank) there are always semistable pairs on \(X\).
    0 references
    semistable
    0 references
    Higgs bundle
    0 references
    moduli spaces
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references