Some thoughts on Gerstenhaber's theorem (Q472434): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2014.10.009 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1967643139 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 18:35, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Some thoughts on Gerstenhaber's theorem |
scientific article |
Statements
Some thoughts on Gerstenhaber's theorem (English)
0 references
19 November 2014
0 references
The paper under review aims at rekindling the interest in extensions of Gerstenhaber's theorem from two commuting matrices to three commuting matrices. The authors mainly discuss possible answers to the question: Must the (unital) subalgebra \(F[A, B, C]\) generated by matrices \(A, B, C\in M_n(F)\) over a field \(F\) have dimension at most \(n\)? For fields of characteristic zero, it is known to be true for \(n\leq 11\) but fails when \(n\geq 29\). A discussion is made on how the gap for \(12\leq n \leq 28\) can be closed. Other situations for which the extension of Gerstenhaber's theorem fails are also pointed out.
0 references
commutative matrix algebras
0 references
irreducible matrix varieties
0 references