When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? (Q1063984): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7152(85)90028-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2083549775 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 19:02, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations?
scientific article

    Statements

    When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    We assume as model a standard multivariate regression of y on x, fitted to a controlled calibration sample and used to estimate unknown x's from observed y-values. The standard weighted least squares estimator ('classical', regress y on x and 'solve' for x) and the biased inverse regression estimator (regress x on y) are compared with respect to mean squared error. The regions are derived where the inverse regression estimator yields the smaller MSE. For any particular component of x this region is likely to contain 'most' future values in usual practice. For simultaneous estimation this needs not be true, however.
    0 references
    controlled calibration sample
    0 references
    weighted least squares estimator
    0 references
    biased inverse regression estimator
    0 references
    mean squared error
    0 references

    Identifiers