When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? (Q1063984): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7152(85)90028-8 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2083549775 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 19:02, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? |
scientific article |
Statements
When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? (English)
0 references
1985
0 references
We assume as model a standard multivariate regression of y on x, fitted to a controlled calibration sample and used to estimate unknown x's from observed y-values. The standard weighted least squares estimator ('classical', regress y on x and 'solve' for x) and the biased inverse regression estimator (regress x on y) are compared with respect to mean squared error. The regions are derived where the inverse regression estimator yields the smaller MSE. For any particular component of x this region is likely to contain 'most' future values in usual practice. For simultaneous estimation this needs not be true, however.
0 references
controlled calibration sample
0 references
weighted least squares estimator
0 references
biased inverse regression estimator
0 references
mean squared error
0 references