A counterexample for the change of variable formula in KH integrals (Q416417): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.14321/realanalexch.36.2.0491 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1516092836 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 20:27, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A counterexample for the change of variable formula in KH integrals
scientific article

    Statements

    A counterexample for the change of variable formula in KH integrals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    10 May 2012
    0 references
    If \(F(x)\) and \(\psi(x)\) are Riemann integrals of the form \(\int^x_b f\,dx\) and \(\int^x_b \psi\,dx\), resp. then \(\psi\,f\circ\psi\), if defined, is Riemann integrable. Furthermore, the change of variable formula applies, giving \[ \int^x_b \psi\,f\circ\psi\,dx= F(\psi(x))- F(\psi(b)). \] The author generalizes this theorem to the Kurzweil-Henstock (KH) integral; in other words, assuming that \(F\) and \(\psi\) are KH integrals of \(f\) and \(\psi\), resp. one would expect that \(\psi\,f\circ\psi\) be KH integrable. The author proves that this is false, and produces a composition of two absolutely continuous functions that does not need to be ACG.
    0 references
    0 references
    substitution theorem
    0 references
    change of variable
    0 references
    counterexample
    0 references
    example
    0 references
    integral
    0 references
    integration
    0 references
    Kurzweil
    0 references
    Henstock
    0 references
    variational
    0 references
    0 references