Relations between the minors of a generic matrix (Q2437409): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2962733708 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 19:42, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Relations between the minors of a generic matrix
scientific article

    Statements

    Relations between the minors of a generic matrix (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 March 2014
    0 references
    Given a \(m\times n\) generic matrix, it is known that the Plücker relation generate the minimal relations of the maximal minors of the matrix and they are the only quadratic minimal relations. For example, let \(X=[x_{ij}]\), \(1\leq i\leq2\), \(1\leq j\leq4\) be a \(2\times4\) generic matrix over a field \(k\). Write \([ij]=x_{1i}x_{2j}-x_{1j}x_{2i}\), one has \([12][34]-[13][24]+[14][23]=0\), the Plücker relation. The relations of non-maximal minors are not known and this paper provides a study of these relations. The authors exhibit the only degree 2 (minimal) relations between 2-minors of an \(m\times n\) matrix are Plücker relations. However this is not true anymore for \(t\)-minors with \(t\geq3\). They describe all the degree 2 relations between \(t\)-minors for any \(t\geq2\). They also exhibit cubic relations and prove that there are no further minimal cubic relations for \(t=2\) and \(t=3\). They conjecture that the highest weight relations they have identified generate the ideal of relations for all \(t,m,n\) (Conjecture 2.12). The approach is through the representation theory of the general linear group and so the authors work over a field of characteristic 0.
    0 references
    0 references
    relations of minors
    0 references
    determinantal varieties
    0 references
    plethysms
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers