Sheaves, localizations, and unstable extensions: Some counterexamples (Q1175756): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
| Property / full work available at URL | |||
| Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(91)90164-4 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID: W1965984640 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 19:42, 19 March 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Sheaves, localizations, and unstable extensions: Some counterexamples |
scientific article |
Statements
Sheaves, localizations, and unstable extensions: Some counterexamples (English)
0 references
25 June 1992
0 references
The author defines the notion of a universal closure operation for a locally presentable category \(\underline C\). However, a universal closure operation on \(\underline C\) need not be induced from a localization of \(\underline C\). The counterexample to prove this point occupies most of the paper. It is found by considering certain categories \(\mathbb{G}(M_ c)\) of groups over monoids and solving a suitable word problem. Using restricted categories the author also shows that sheafification need not preserve monics.
0 references
universal closure operation
0 references
locally presentable category
0 references
categories of groups over monoids
0 references
word problem
0 references
sheafification
0 references
