The parallelogram rule from Pseudo-Aristotle to Newton (Q524418): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-016-0183-2 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2547146895 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 20:50, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The parallelogram rule from Pseudo-Aristotle to Newton |
scientific article |
Statements
The parallelogram rule from Pseudo-Aristotle to Newton (English)
0 references
2 May 2017
0 references
This paper traces the history of the parallelogram rule -- ``If two uniform and independent quantities are represented as adjacent sides of a parallelogram, their composite will be represented by the diagonal'' -- ``from its first adumbration in Pseudo-Aristotle [\textit{Questiones mechanicae}] to its inculcation in physical science during Newton's lifetime''. The story is significantly complicated by resistance to conceptual matters, primarily to the notion of physical quantities as directed magnitudes. It is ``a tale of slow and halting development, impeded by resistance to the representative and conceptual framework it requires''. Although suggested in \textit{Questiones mechanicae}, ``late-Renaissance readers failed to comprehend its significance''. The modern rule can be traced to Stevin, Fermat and Hobbes (in response to Descartes's \textit{Optics}). Its modern, axiomatic status, can be found in the third part of John Wallis's \textit{Mechanica} (1671), in Pierre Varignon's \textit{Projet d'une nouvelle méchanique} (1687), and as the first corollary to the ``Axioms or laws of motion'' in Newton's \textit{Principia} (1687).
0 references
parallelogram rule
0 references
Simon Stevin
0 references
John Wallis
0 references
Pierre Varignon
0 references
Newton
0 references