First integrals versus configurational invariants and a weak form of complete integrability (Q1067673): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(85)90136-8 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2057755159 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 21:45, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | First integrals versus configurational invariants and a weak form of complete integrability |
scientific article |
Statements
First integrals versus configurational invariants and a weak form of complete integrability (English)
0 references
1985
0 references
A confusion over the concept of first integrals, which has been created in a recent paper by \textit{L. S. Hall} [Physica D 8, 90-116 (1983; Zbl 0538.58020)] is clarified. The clear distinction between first integrals and functions which are first integrals only on a specific, fixed hypersurface is discussed. Hall's terminology of configurational invariants is adopted for the latter case. The possible relevance of knowing configurational invariants for a Hamiltonian system is illustrated by results concerning a weak form of the theory on complete integrability.
0 references
Poisson brackets
0 references
constraints
0 references
cubic potentials
0 references
first integrals
0 references
complete integrability
0 references