First integrals versus configurational invariants and a weak form of complete integrability (Q1067673): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(85)90136-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2057755159 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 21:45, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
First integrals versus configurational invariants and a weak form of complete integrability
scientific article

    Statements

    First integrals versus configurational invariants and a weak form of complete integrability (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    A confusion over the concept of first integrals, which has been created in a recent paper by \textit{L. S. Hall} [Physica D 8, 90-116 (1983; Zbl 0538.58020)] is clarified. The clear distinction between first integrals and functions which are first integrals only on a specific, fixed hypersurface is discussed. Hall's terminology of configurational invariants is adopted for the latter case. The possible relevance of knowing configurational invariants for a Hamiltonian system is illustrated by results concerning a weak form of the theory on complete integrability.
    0 references
    0 references
    Poisson brackets
    0 references
    constraints
    0 references
    cubic potentials
    0 references
    first integrals
    0 references
    complete integrability
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references