An evaluation of substepping and implicit stress point algorithms (Q1913198): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
| Property / full work available at URL | |||
| Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(94)90094-9 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID: W1997578307 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 22:19, 19 March 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | An evaluation of substepping and implicit stress point algorithms |
scientific article |
Statements
An evaluation of substepping and implicit stress point algorithms (English)
0 references
11 July 1996
0 references
The basic assumptions on `substepping' and `return' methods are described, and the associated errors are compared. This comparative study is undertaken both at a fundamental level and when applied to a typical boundary value problem. The errors associated with both methods are increment-size dependent. It is shown that for a particular increment size, the `substepping' method is the more accurate.
0 references
implicit return algorithm
0 references
error control
0 references
strain hardening/softening modified Cam clay constitutive model
0 references
substepping method
0 references
