Generalized matrix inversion is not harder than matrix multiplication (Q1026453): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2008.11.012 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2122385067 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 21:28, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Generalized matrix inversion is not harder than matrix multiplication |
scientific article |
Statements
Generalized matrix inversion is not harder than matrix multiplication (English)
0 references
25 June 2009
0 references
The paper introduces a completely block recursive algorithm for generalized Cholesky factorization of a given symmetric, positive semi-definite matrix \(A\in\mathbb R^{n\times n},\) starting from the Strassen method for rapid matrix multiplication and inversion as well as from recursive Cholesky factorization algorithm. The first section is an introduction in nature. The second section states a recursive algorithm for rapid matrix inversion, not harder than the matrix multiplication. In the third section the authors introduce a new Strassen-type full recursive algorithm for simultaneous fast computation of the Cholesky factorization matrix \(U\) satisfying \(A=U^TU,\) and its inverse \(Y.\) The algorithm is applicable to symmetric positive-definite matrices. In the fourth section the authors use the results obtained in the previous sections in order to develop algorithms to compute Moore-Penrose and various classes of \(\{2,\,3\}\) and \(\{2,\,4\}\) generalized inverses. These algorithms are not harder than the matrix multiplication. The authors present the implementation of the proposed algorithms in the symbolic programming package MATHEMATICA. Numerical examples are within the fifth section. The algorithms are tested on randomly generated test set matrices. Testing results show the efficiency of the proposed algorithms. The main conclusions are presented in the last section.
0 references
Cholesky factorization
0 references
complexity analysis
0 references
generalized inverse
0 references
Moore-Penrose inverse
0 references
Strassen method
0 references
recursive algorithm
0 references
rapid matrix multiplication
0 references
rapid matrix inversion
0 references
numerical examples
0 references