Tridiagonalization of complex matrices and a problem of Longstaff (Q1111648): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(88)90207-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2007637012 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 22:47, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Tridiagonalization of complex matrices and a problem of Longstaff
scientific article

    Statements

    Tridiagonalization of complex matrices and a problem of Longstaff (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    Given a positive integer k, a square matrix \(B=(b_{ij})\) is called (2k- 1)-diagonal if \(b_{ij}=0\) for \(| i-j| >k-1\). A complex \(n\times n\) square matrix is called (2k-1)-diagonalizable if it is unitarily similar to a (2k-1)-diagonal matrix. The author proves that, for \(n>2k- 1+\sqrt{2k^ 2-2k+1},\) there exist \(n\times n\) complex matrices which are not (2k-1)-diagonalizable. This answers in the negative a question posed for \(k=2\) by \textit{W. E. Longstaff} [ibid. 109, 153-163 (1988; reviewed above)]. Thus, if there is a classification of the indecomposable under unitary similarity complex square matrices in terms of multidiagonal matrices, then there must exist canonical matrices with an arbitrarily large number of diagonals.
    0 references
    tridiagonal matrices
    0 references
    p-banded matrices
    0 references
    unitary similarity
    0 references
    multidiagonal matrices
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers