An answer to Littlewood's problem on boundedness for super-linear Duffing's equations (Q1114059): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(88)90108-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1978798166 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 23:41, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An answer to Littlewood's problem on boundedness for super-linear Duffing's equations
scientific article

    Statements

    An answer to Littlewood's problem on boundedness for super-linear Duffing's equations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    The author proves the following theorem: Consider the equation \((1)\quad x''+g(x)=p(t),\) where p is continuous, periodic, and g is \(C^ 1\), with a super-linear growth at infinity. Then, each solution of (1) is bounded on \({\mathbb{R}}\). This is a complete answer, in the super-linear case, to a problem brought up by J. Littlewood, regarding the boundedness of solutions of a second order differential equation. Partial results have previously been obtained in the case where g is a polynomial. The proof is based on two properties: a ``twist property'', the fact that solutions tend to spiral around any given point faster and faster when the initial value is taken from further and further; existence of positively (resp. negatively) invariant sets with respect to the Poincaré map (associated to (1)): those sets can be chosen in such a way that they form a cut in any ball of the phase plane, (which is a spiral around the center of the ball) has to cross somewhere, this is the essence of T. Ding's proof. As a final remark, let us make a short comparison with the time independent situation: in that case, orbits of periodic solutions enclose invariant domains, the union of them covers the whole plane. The main difficulty in the time dependent case lies in the fact that the orbits of periodic solutions do not determine invariant domains anymore.
    0 references
    0 references
    boundedness of solutions
    0 references
    twist property
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references