Complements to Li's criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis (Q1125406): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q29037901, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1710884486334
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q29037901 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 22:48, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Complements to Li's criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis
scientific article

    Statements

    Complements to Li's criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 February 2000
    0 references
    It was shown by \textit{Xian-Jin Li} [J. Number Theory 65, 325-333 (1997; Zbl 0884.11036)] that the Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to the statement that \[ \lambda_n:= \left.\frac{1} {(n-1)!} \frac{d^n} {ds^n} [s^{n-1}\log \xi(s)] \right|_{s=1}> 0 \] for every natural number \(n\), where \(\xi(s)\) is the usual Riemann \(\xi\)-function. One easily sees that, for the natural interpretation of the conditionally convergent sum, one has \[ \lambda_n= \sum\{1- (1-\rho^{-1})^n\} \] where \(\rho\) runs over the non-trivial zeros of \(\zeta(s)\). In the present paper one takes \(\rho\) to run over any multiset of complex numbers satisfying the usual 4-fold symmetry involving \(1-\rho\) and \(\overline{\rho}\), along with some other mild conditions. The principal result is then that the positivity of the number \(\lambda_n\) is equivalent to the statement that \(\Re(\rho)= 1/2\) for all \(\rho\). The paper goes on to express \(\lambda_n\) via Weil's explicit formula, and to interpret Li's criterion in terms of Weil's positivity condition.
    0 references
    Riemann hypothesis
    0 references
    zeros
    0 references
    Weil's explicit formula
    0 references
    Li's criterion
    0 references
    Weil's positivity condition
    0 references

    Identifiers