A geometric approach to finding new lower bounds of \(A(n,d,w)\) (Q2384016): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-007-9064-7 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2131573105 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 23:57, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A geometric approach to finding new lower bounds of \(A(n,d,w)\)
scientific article

    Statements

    A geometric approach to finding new lower bounds of \(A(n,d,w)\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    20 September 2007
    0 references
    The largest possible size of a binary code of length \(n\), constant weight \(w\), and minimum Hamming distance \(d\) is denoted by \(A(n,d,w)\). Lower bounds on \(A(n,d,w)\) can be obtained by constructing corresponding codes. One (trivial) family of good constant weight codes can be obtained by taking the codewords as the columns of a \(v(v-1)/2 \times v\) 0-1 matrix where each row contains exactly two 1s and no two rows are identical; this code attains \(A(v(v-1)/2,2v-4,v-1)=v\). The authors find lower bounds on and exact values of \(A(n,2w-2,w)\) by a construction starting from the aforementioned (and similar) codes. The new bounds obtained are for codes of length greater than 28, which have only received limited interest in the literature, so it is difficult to say how the constructions presented compare with other known methods.
    0 references
    0 references
    constant weight code
    0 references
    0 references