Accuracy improvement of the method of multiple scales for nonlinear vibration analyses of continuous systems with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities (Q624735): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/890813 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1998853591 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 00:08, 20 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Accuracy improvement of the method of multiple scales for nonlinear vibration analyses of continuous systems with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities |
scientific article |
Statements
Accuracy improvement of the method of multiple scales for nonlinear vibration analyses of continuous systems with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities (English)
0 references
9 February 2011
0 references
Summary: This paper proposes an accuracy improvement of the method of multiple scales (MMSs) for nonlinear vibration analyses of continuous systems with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities. As an example, we treat a shallow suspended cable subjected to a harmonic excitation, and investigate the primary resonance of the \(n\)th in-plane mode (\(\Omega \approx \omega_m)\) in which \(\Omega\) and \(w_m\) are the driving and natural frequencies, respectively. The application of Galerkin's procedure to the equation of motion yields nonlinear ordinary differential equations with quadratic and cubic nonlinear terms. The steady-state responses are obtained by using the discretization approach of the MMS in which the definition of the detuning parameter, expressing the relationship between the natural frequency and the driving frequency, is changed in an attempt to improve the accuracy of the solutions. The validity of the solutions is discussed by comparing them with solutions of the direct approach of the MMS and the finite difference method.
0 references