Uniform convergence theorem for the \(H_1\)-integral revisited (Q1417175): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.11650/twjm/1500558401 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4232141210 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 00:14, 20 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Uniform convergence theorem for the \(H_1\)-integral revisited |
scientific article |
Statements
Uniform convergence theorem for the \(H_1\)-integral revisited (English)
0 references
2003
0 references
A function \(f: [a,b]\to\mathbb{R}\) is \(H_1\)-integrable on \([a,b]\) to a number \(A\) if there exists a positive function \(\delta\) on \([a,b]\) such that for every \(\varepsilon> 0\) there exists a division \(D_0\) of \([a,b]\) such that \(|(D)\sum f(\xi)(v-u)- A|\leq\varepsilon\) for every \(\delta\)-fine division \(D\supseteq D_0\). Here \(D\supseteq D_0\) if for every \(([s,t],\eta)\in D\) there is \(([u,v],\xi)\in D_0\) such that \([s,t]\subset [u,v]\). It is proved in this note that the uniform convergence theorem does not hold for the \(H_1\)-integral.
0 references
\(H_1\)-integral
0 references
Henstock integral
0 references
Kurzweil integral
0 references