Modules with chain conditions for finite matrix subgroups (Q1355560): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jabr.1996.6882 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2052091725 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:29, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Modules with chain conditions for finite matrix subgroups
scientific article

    Statements

    Modules with chain conditions for finite matrix subgroups (English)
    0 references
    9 November 1997
    0 references
    The author presents new ways of describing modules with maximum resp. minimum condition for finite matrix subgroups and shows that these chain conditions can be characterized by two well-known natural transformations. The first one is \(\mu\colon\text{Hom}_S(P,M)\otimes_RA\to\text{Hom}_S(P,M\otimes_R A)\) given by \(\mu(\varphi\otimes a)(x)=\varphi(x)\otimes a\) for \(\varphi\in\text{Hom}_S(P,M)\), \(a\in A\) and \(x\in P\). Here \(_SM_R\) is a bimodule and \(_SP\) and \(_RA\) are modules. Dual results are proven by studying the homomorphism \(\nu\colon c\otimes_R\text{Hom}_S(M,U)\to\text{Hom}_S(\text{Hom}_R(C,M),U)\) with \(\nu(c\otimes\varphi)(g)=\varphi(g(c))\) for \(c\in C\), \(\varphi\in\text{Hom}_S(M,U)\), and \(g\in\text{Hom}_R(C,M)\), where \(_SM_R\) is a bimodule and \(C_R\) and \(_SU\) are modules.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    pure-injective modules
    0 references
    finite matrix subgroups
    0 references
    chain conditions
    0 references
    natural transformations
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references