Properties of superharmonic functions satisfying nonlinear inequalities in nonsmooth domains (Q616643): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/06241043 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2092014060 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:00, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Properties of superharmonic functions satisfying nonlinear inequalities in nonsmooth domains
scientific article

    Statements

    Properties of superharmonic functions satisfying nonlinear inequalities in nonsmooth domains (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    12 January 2011
    0 references
    Let \(\Omega \) be a bounded uniform domain in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) (\(n\geq 3\)), or a bounded NTA domain in \(\mathbb{R}^{2}\), and let \(\delta _{\Omega }(x)\) denote the distance from a point \(x\) in \(\Omega \) to the boundary. This paper is concerned with positive superharmonic functions \(u\) on \(\Omega \) which satisfy the inequality \(-\Delta u\leq c\delta _{\Omega }^{-\alpha}u^{p}\). Here \(c>0\), \(\alpha \geq 0\) and \(p>1\), and \(\alpha ,p\) are subject to bounds that depend on the geometry of \(\Omega \). In the case of smooth domains these bounds are given by \(p\leq (n+1)/(n-1)\) and \(\alpha \leq n+1-p(n-1)\). The author shows that, in several respects, such functions behave somewhat like positive harmonic functions on \(\Omega \). For example, Harnack-type inequalities are established. Another example is that, if \(u\) and \(v\) are two such functions, then \(u/v\) has a finite non-tangential limit almost everywhere on \(\partial \Omega \) with respect to the measure associated with the greatest harmonic minorant of \(v\) in its Martin representation. (The Martin boundary of a bounded uniform domain is homeomorphic to its Euclidean boundary.) Note: The author has advised that, to be consistent with the overall assumption in the paper that \(\alpha \geq 0\), the formulation of Theorem 4.1 should say that, if \(1<p<(n+\tau )/(n+\tau -2)\) and \(0\leq \alpha <n+\tau-p(n+\tau -2)\), then (4.2) holds; moreover, if \(i(\tau )>0\), then (4.2) holds when \(1<p\leq (n+\tau )/(n+\tau -2)\) and \(0\leq \alpha \leq n+\tau-p(n+\tau -2)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    superharmonic function
    0 references
    semilinear elliptic equation
    0 references
    non-tangential limit
    0 references
    Harnack inequality
    0 references
    reverse mean value inequality
    0 references
    0 references