Algebrable sets of hypercyclic vectors for convolution operators (Q2200032): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W3034042404 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:08, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Algebrable sets of hypercyclic vectors for convolution operators
scientific article

    Statements

    Algebrable sets of hypercyclic vectors for convolution operators (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    15 September 2020
    0 references
    In this paper the authors answer in the affirmative a question posed by R. M. Aron (whether there is a hypercyclic algebra for the complex derivation operator \(D:H(\mathbb C)\to H(\mathbb C)\) that is not finitely generated) by using a slightly different version of a result by the authors themselves (with J. A. Conejero). Under the additional requirement that \(\Phi(0)\) belongs to the open unit disc, they show that not only \(\Phi(D)\) admits a hypercyclic algebra but that \(HC(\mathbb C)\cup\{0\}\) is densely strongly-algebrable and that, for each \(N\in\mathbb N\), the set of \(f\in H(\mathbb C)^N\) that freely generates a hypercyclic algebra for \(\Phi(D)\) is residual in \(H(\mathbb C)^N\). A corollary establishing a criterion for a family of convolution operators to admit a densely strongly-algebrable set of hypercyclic vectors is also given. The authors also obtain a criterion which puts in relation multiplicative weakly mixing operators with those who have densely strongly-algebrable sets of hypercyclic vectors. The result holds on any separable, commutative \(F\)-algebra \(X\), over \(\mathbb K=\mathbb C\) or \(\mathbb R\), admitting a dense freely generated subalgebra. The authors show that, for a multiplicative weakly mixing operator \(T\) on \(X\), having a hypercyclic algebra is equivalent to having a densely strongly-algebrable set of hypercyclic vectors, and this can be decided by verifying the density of the range of all maps \(\hat{P}:X\to X, f\mapsto P(f)\), where \(P\) is a non zero polynomial in \(\mathbb K[x]\) satisfying \(P(0)=0\). In particular, as such a polynomial property does not depend on the operators, it turns out that either all multiplicative weakly mixing operators on \(X\) have densely strongly-algebrable sets of hypercyclic vectors, or no one has even one hypercyclic algebra. Since the \(F\)-algebra \(C^\infty(\mathbb R,\mathbb C)\) has this property and admits a multiplicative operator having a hypercyclic algebra, it follows that all multiplicative operators that are weakly mixing support a dense, non-finitely generated algebra of hypercyclic vectors. This includes all translation operators \(T_a\) (\(a\neq 0\)) on \(C^\infty(\mathbb R,\mathbb C)\). Some examples of \(F\)-algebras with no multiplicative operator having a hypercyclic algebra are also given, such as \(H_{\mathbb R}(\mathbb C)=\{f\in H(\mathbb C) : f(\mathbb R)\subset \mathbb R\}\) over \(\mathbb K=\mathbb R\).
    0 references
    algebrability
    0 references
    convolution operators
    0 references
    hypercyclic vectors
    0 references

    Identifiers