Canonical foliations of certain classes of almost contact metric structures (Q2581213): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10114-004-0520-2 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2021935068 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:11, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Canonical foliations of certain classes of almost contact metric structures
scientific article

    Statements

    Canonical foliations of certain classes of almost contact metric structures (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 January 2006
    0 references
    Let \((\varphi,\xi, \eta, g)\) be an almost contact metric structure on a \((2n+1)\)-dimensional manifold \(M\) and denote by \(\phi\) the corresponding Kähler 2-form \(\phi\). The manifold \(M\) equipped with this structure is said to be \(\alpha\)-cosymplectic, \(\alpha\) being a real number, if \(d \eta = 0, d \phi = 2 \alpha \eta \wedge \phi\). This class of manifolds contains two interesting subclasses, namely for \(\alpha = 0\), \(M\) is almost cosymplectic and for \(\alpha \neq 0\), \(M\) is almost \(\alpha\)-Kenmotsu. The following two cases provide well-known examples: Let \(N\) be an almost Kähler manifold. Then the product \(N \times \mathbb R\) is almost cosymplectic. The warped product \(N \times_f \mathbb R\) with \(f(s) = ce^s\), \(c\) being a nonzero constant, provides an almost \(\alpha\)-Kenmotsu manifold after a homothetic change of the almost Kenmotsu structure (for \(\alpha = 1\)). Since \(d \eta = 0\), the contact distribution \(D_i = \text{ker}\, \eta\) defines a (canonical) foliation \(f\) of codimension \(1\) on \(M\). This foliation, together with the orthogonal complementary foliation \(f^\perp\) generated by \(\xi\), have already been investigated for the two subclasses mentioned above. The main purpose of this paper is to extend this study to the general case in a unifying way. This is done by using the basic formulas contained, for example, in fundamental work of Z. Olszak. Here the operator \(h = - \frac 12 \varphi {\mathcal L}_\xi \varphi\), defined on \(M\) by means of the Lie derivative \({\mathcal L}\), plays an important role.
    0 references

    Identifiers