Positive analytic capacity but zero Buffon needle probability (Q1107661): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1988.133.99 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2066811174 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:15, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Positive analytic capacity but zero Buffon needle probability
scientific article

    Statements

    Positive analytic capacity but zero Buffon needle probability (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    One of Vitushkin's famous questions is whether the analytic capacity \(\gamma\) (\(\cdot)\) and the Buffon length Bu(\(\cdot)\) have the same null sets. (The Buffon length of a planar set E is the average length of the orthogonal projection of E (averaging over all possible directions)). \textit{P. Mattila} proved that the answer to this question is no [Ann. Math., II. Ser. 123, 303-309 (1986; Zbl 0589.28006)]. However, Mattila's argument did not give which of the implications \[ 1)\quad \gamma (E)=0\quad \Rightarrow \quad Bu(E)=0,\quad 2)\quad Bu(E)=0\quad \Rightarrow \quad \gamma (E)=0 \] are false. In this paper an explicit construction is given of a set \(E_ 0\) such that \(\gamma (E_ 0)=1\) and \(Bu(E_ 0)=0\). \(E_ 0\) is a ``crank'', i.e. a limit of certain families of line segments parallel to the x-axis.
    0 references
    analytic capacity
    0 references
    Buffon length
    0 references
    null sets
    0 references
    crank
    0 references

    Identifiers