A note on finite difference method to analysis an ill-posed problem (Q858752): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
| Property / full work available at URL | |||
| Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.05.003 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID: W1981473068 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 01:20, 20 March 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A note on finite difference method to analysis an ill-posed problem |
scientific article |
Statements
A note on finite difference method to analysis an ill-posed problem (English)
0 references
11 January 2007
0 references
The note is going to analyze the assertions of the paper by \textit{A. Shidfar} and \textit{R. Pourgholi} [ibid. 168, No. 2, 1400--1408 (2005; Zbl 1079.65098)] on a finite difference approach for solving a specific inverse problem of heat conduction with respect to error stability. Because of an exponential error growth and large errors near the left boundary and for small times the authors refuse to believe the applicability of the suggested finite difference method for that problem. Numerical case studies show the error behaviour of the method rather clear. Unfortunately, the note contains a couple of typos. For example please read `method to analyse' in the title.
0 references
inverse heat conduction problem
0 references
exponential error growth
0 references
numerical case study
0 references
numerical examples
0 references
