The evolution of transformation media in spherical trigonometry in 17th- and 18th-century China, and its relation to ``Western learning'' (Q2654170): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2009.06.003 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2092418315 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 01:34, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The evolution of transformation media in spherical trigonometry in 17th- and 18th-century China, and its relation to ``Western learning''
scientific article

    Statements

    The evolution of transformation media in spherical trigonometry in 17th- and 18th-century China, and its relation to ``Western learning'' (English)
    0 references
    15 January 2010
    0 references
    The present article is the first of its kind to offer an extensive presentation of the development of trigonometry in 17th and 18th centuries China. After having analysed Chinese conceptions relating to this special branch of mathematics prior to the 17-th century, the author explain that \textit{A. Magini} (1555--1617) 's Trigonometriae Sphaericorum was adapted into Chinese by the Italian Jesuit \textit{Giacomo Rho} (1592--1638). Then he explains precisely that \textit{Mei Wending} (1633--1721) and Dai Zhen's trigonometrical techniques were based on the construction of solids, plane projections, proportionality and the properties of rectangular triangles. While doing this, he gives numerous reproduction of Chinese original figures together with simplified reproductions easily legible by all readers; he also make clear that Dai Zhen was influenced by Mei Wending without never acknowledging his debt towards his predecessor. Chinese ideas about the identity of Western and Chinese methods are also analysed as well as 19th centuries opinions of Chinese mathematicians concerning these two mathematicians. Last but not least a very good bibliography (original works and modern studies (60 items) closes this valuable article.
    0 references
    trigonometry
    0 references
    Mei Wending
    0 references
    Dai Zhen
    0 references
    Giacomo Rho
    0 references
    A. Magini
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references