Conformal vector fields with respect to the Sasaki metric tensor (Q2490682): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00022-005-0033-x / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1988799736 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 02:15, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Conformal vector fields with respect to the Sasaki metric tensor
scientific article

    Statements

    Conformal vector fields with respect to the Sasaki metric tensor (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    18 May 2006
    0 references
    Let \((M,g)\) be a Riemannian manifold of \(\dim n\geq 3\) and \((x^i)\), \(1\leq i\leq n\), a local chart on \(M\). Then, the associated chart of the tangent bundle TM is \((x^i,\dot x^j)\), where \(\dot x^j(u)= u^j\) for any tangent vector \(u =u^j\partial/\partial x^j\) on \(M\). Let \(e_i\) and \(\overline e_i\) be the nonholonomic frame field on TM defined by \(e_i =\partial/\partial x^i-\dot x^q\Gamma^r_{qi} \partial/\partial\dot x^r\), \(e_{\overline i} =\partial/\partial\dot x^i\) where \(\overline i\) stands for \(n+i\). Denoting the dual of \(e_i\) and \(e_{\overline i}\) by \(\theta^i\) and \(\theta^{\overline i}\), respectively, the Sasaki metric \(G\) on TM is defined by \(g_{ij}(\theta^i\otimes \theta^j +\theta^{\overline i}\otimes \theta^{\overline j})\). For any tensor field \(\mathbb A\in\mathbb X^{p,q}(M)\), let \(\mathbb A\), \({}^h\mathbb A\), \({}^c\mathbb A\) and \({}^n\mathbb A\) be its vertical, horizontal, complete and natural lifts in the usual sense. Then the author proves the following theorem: \(A\in \mathbb X^{1,0}(T(M))\) is a conformal vector field with respect to the Sasaki metric if and only if \[ A = c_X+ {}Y+{}^cP +E{}^c \text{grad}(b) +E\, a+{}^na_b{}^nI-\tfrac13\,E^n\text{grad}(a_b), \] where \(X,Y\in\mathbb X^{1,0}(M)\), \(P\in\mathbb X^{1,1}(M)\quad E=\tfrac12 \,g_{ij}\dot x_i\dot x_j\) and \(b = \frac{1}{n}\text{div}(X)\), \(a=-\frac{1}{n}\text{div(grad)}(Y)\), such that (a) \(X\) is a conformal vector field and \(\nabla\nabla b= 0\), (b) \(\nabla\nabla Y+g\otimes a\), \(\nabla\nabla a\), \({\mathcal I}_Y+\frac{2}{3}(g\otimes \nabla a_b)\), \({\mathcal I}_a\) are antisymmetric in the first two arguments, where \({\mathcal I}_B\) is defined by \({\mathcal I}_B(X,Y,X,W)=g\nabla((R(X,Y,Z),B),W)\). (c) \(P\) is skewsymmetric and satisfies \(\nabla P= I\otimes db-g\otimes\text{grad}(b)\). When \(M\) is compact, the above complicated theorem reduces to a simple one, namely, \(A\) is a conformal vector field if and only if \(A\) is a Killing vector field with respect to the Sasaki metric.
    0 references
    conformal vector fields
    0 references
    Sasaki metric
    0 references
    classical differential geometry
    0 references
    conformal differential geometry
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers