Second order and \(L^ p\)-comparisons between the boostrap and empirical Edgeworth expansion methodologies (Q1118922): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
m rollbackEdits.php mass rollback Tag: Rollback |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
| Property / full work available at URL | |||
| Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347008 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID: W2006282518 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 08:36, 20 March 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Second order and \(L^ p\)-comparisons between the boostrap and empirical Edgeworth expansion methodologies |
scientific article |
Statements
Second order and \(L^ p\)-comparisons between the boostrap and empirical Edgeworth expansion methodologies (English)
0 references
1989
0 references
The boostrap estimate of distribution functions of studentized statistics is shown to be more accurate than even the two-term empirical Edgeworth expansion, thus strengthening the claim of superiority of the boostrap over the normal approximation method. The two methods are compared not only with respect to bounded bowl-shaped loss functions but also with respect to squared error loss and, more generally, in \(L^ p\)-norms.
0 references
Cramer's condition
0 references
Lp-norms
0 references
boostrap estimate
0 references
studentized statistics
0 references
two-term empirical Edgeworth expansion
0 references
normal approximation
0 references
bounded bowl-shaped loss functions
0 references
squared error loss
0 references
