Examples and counterexamples for \(M_{1,1}\) embeddings (Q1891495): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q124883404, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711055989931
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q124883404 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:50, 22 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Examples and counterexamples for \(M_{1,1}\) embeddings
scientific article

    Statements

    Examples and counterexamples for \(M_{1,1}\) embeddings (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    24 April 1996
    0 references
    The smallest verbally prime algebras after the supercommutative algebras are the algebras equivalent to \(M_{1,1}\). The polynomial identities of Grassmann algebras were determined by Popov. \(M_{1,1}\) has a natural \(Z/2Z\)-grading and Di Vincenzo determined the \(Z/2Z\)-graded identities. Kemer proved that \(M_{1,1}\) is polynomial identity equivalent to the tensor product of any two supercommutative algebras, and Di Vincenzo extended that result to show that they are also equivalent as \(Z/2Z\)- graded algebras. In this paper the author presents two counterexamples and one positive result on the subject of graded embedding.
    0 references
    matrix embeddings
    0 references
    graded identities
    0 references
    graded algebras
    0 references
    verbally prime algebras
    0 references
    supercommutative algebras
    0 references
    polynomial identities
    0 references
    Grassmann algebras
    0 references
    tensor products
    0 references
    graded embeddings
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers