Three counterexamples in the theory of inertial manifolds (Q5942000): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q124937324, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711486624475
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q124937324 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 23:07, 26 March 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1637727
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Three counterexamples in the theory of inertial manifolds
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1637727

    Statements

    Three counterexamples in the theory of inertial manifolds (English)
    0 references
    14 May 2002
    0 references
    The author considers a dissipative semilinear parabolic equation \(\dot u=-Au+F(u)\), where \(A\) is sectorial and has compact resolvent (also \(\text{Re} \sigma(A)\geq 0)\) and, for certain \(\alpha [0,1)\), \(F\) is globally Lipschitz from \(X^\alpha\) into \(X\) (additionally \(F\in C^1(X^\alpha,X)\) on \(X^1\); \(X\) being a Banach space). In a sequence of lemmas there are given the necessary conditions concerning the existence of a \(C^1\) inertial manifold, especially in the case when the manifold is normally hyperbolic or absolutely normally hyperbolic. In this context the author presents three interesting examples: (i) (pseudodifferential) parabolic equations without inertial \(C^1\)-manifold, (ii) reaction-diffusion equation in bounded subdomains of \(\mathbb{R}^n\) without inertial manifold absolutely normally hyperbolic on the stationary set, (iii) reaction-diffusion equations in a cube \((0,\pi)^3\) without inertial manifold normally hyperbolic at stationary points.
    0 references
    normal hyperbolicity on the stationary set
    0 references
    dissipative semilinear parabolic equation
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references