Lower bounds for Betti numbers of monomial ideals (Q1643553): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1706.09866 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 20:18, 18 April 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Lower bounds for Betti numbers of monomial ideals
scientific article

    Statements

    Lower bounds for Betti numbers of monomial ideals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    19 June 2018
    0 references
    Let \(I\) be a monomial ideal of height \(c\) in a polynomial ring \(S\) over a field \(k\), the Betti number \(\beta_i(S/I)\)) denotes the rank of the \(i\)-th free module appearing in a minimal \(S\)-free resolution of \(S/I\). In this paper under review, the authors prove the following main result: Theorem 1.1. Let \(I\) be a monomial ideal of height \(c\) in a polynomial ring \(S\). If I is not a complete intersection, then \(\Sigma\beta_i(S/I)\geq{2^c+2^{c-1}}\). Furthermore, equality holds if and only if the Betti numbers are \(\{1,3,2\}, \{1, 5, 5, 1\},\) or a extension thereof by tensoring with a Koszul complex. By this when equality holds the generating function for \(\beta_i(S/I)\) is either \((1+3t+2t^2)(1+t)^{c-2}\), or \((1+5t+5t^2+t^3)(1+t)^{c-3}.\) Also, the authors ask the following question: Question 1.2. If I is a homogeneous ideal of height \(c\) in a polynomial ring \(S\) that is not a \(CI\), is \(\beta(S/I)\geq{2^c+2^{c-1}}\)?
    0 references
    0 references
    commutative algebra
    0 references
    Betti numbers
    0 references
    monomial ideals
    0 references
    Buchsbaum-Eisenbud-Horrocks rank conjecture
    0 references

    Identifiers