Lattice points in large convex bodies (Q5905454): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4753788 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3950619 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Number of Lattice Points in a Convex Set / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Über Integrale auf konvexen Körpern. I, II / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Exponential Sums and the Riemann Zeta Function / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Exponential Sums and Lattice Points / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4011127 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3994503 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the lattice rest of a convex body in \(\mathbb{R}^s\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Lattice-Point Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Lattice-Point Problem. II / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Exponential Sums and the Riemann Zeta-Function II / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:30, 15 May 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 28790
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Lattice points in large convex bodies
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 28790

    Statements

    Lattice points in large convex bodies (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 June 1992
    0 references
    Let \(B\) be a compact convex subset of \(\mathbb{R}^s\) which has a smooth boundary with non-zero Gaussian curvature, and put \(A(t)=\#\{x\in\mathbb{Z}^s: t^{-1/2}x\in B\}\). It is easy to find an asymptotic formula for \(A(t)\) with main term \(\operatorname{vol}(B)t^{s/2}\). The authors are concerned with the size of the error term \(P(t)=A(t)-\text{main term}\). A classical result of \textit{E. Hlawka} [J. Reine Angew. Math. 187, 246--252 (1950; Zbl 0036.30901)] provides the estimate \(P(t)\ll t^\lambda\) where \(\lambda=\tfrac{1}{2}\frac{s(s-1)}{s+1}\), whereas here it is shown that one may take \[ \lambda=\frac{3s^2 - 5s + 3}{6s + 2}\quad (s\geq 8);\quad \lambda=\frac{7s^2 - 10s + 4}{14s+8}\quad (3\leq s\leq 7). \] The best result in dimension \(s=2\) is due to Huxley and gives \(\lambda=7/22\) (up to logarithms). However, unlike Huxley's work, the method used here does not depend on the modern discrete circle method but combines Hlawka's approach with more straightforward estimates for exponential sums. As the authors point out, there are further possible improvements, at the cost of complications.
    0 references
    0 references
    number of lattice points
    0 references
    convex body
    0 references
    smooth boundary with non-zero Gaussian curvature
    0 references
    asymptotic formula
    0 references
    error term
    0 references
    Hlawka's approach
    0 references
    estimates for exponential sums
    0 references