Filtering and forecasting with misspecified ARCH models I. Getting the right variance with the wrong model (Q1185106): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 16:18, 15 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Filtering and forecasting with misspecified ARCH models I. Getting the right variance with the wrong model |
scientific article |
Statements
Filtering and forecasting with misspecified ARCH models I. Getting the right variance with the wrong model (English)
0 references
28 June 1992
0 references
For modelling time-varying conditional variances the financial economists have recently used ARCH (autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic) models to specify market volatility. This paper develops conditions under which a misspecified ARCH model may provide a consistent estimate of the conditional covariance matrix of a stochastic process. For example, if the stochastic process generating prices is approximately a diffusion process, then the paper shows that there may still be so much information on the conditional second moments at high frequencies, that even a misspecified ARCH model can be a consistent filter with a high degree of forecasting power. The paper also shows other cases of ARCH models where consistency properties and robustness fail altogether.
0 references
specification bias
0 references
autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic model
0 references
time-varying conditional variances
0 references
misspecified ARCH model
0 references
conditional covariance matrix
0 references
diffusion process
0 references
conditional second moments
0 references
forecasting power
0 references
consistency
0 references
robustness
0 references
0 references
0 references