An almost-constant round interactive zero-knowledge proof (Q1198029): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4040055 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Minimum disclosure proofs of knowledge / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3358225 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Zero-knowledge proofs of identity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: How To Prove Yourself: Practical Solutions to Identification and Signature Problems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Computational Complexity of Probabilistic Turing Machines / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4038698 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Proofs that yield nothing but their validity or all languages in NP have zero-knowledge proof systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3197311 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 14:35, 16 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An almost-constant round interactive zero-knowledge proof
scientific article

    Statements

    An almost-constant round interactive zero-knowledge proof (English)
    0 references
    16 January 1993
    0 references
    We consider an Arthur-Merlin black-box IZKP for which \(t(| x|)\succ1\), that is, \(t\) is any unbounded function of \(| x|\). We are concerned with functions which grow very slowly, significantly slower than any iterated logarithm. For example, we can take \(t=\log\ast| x|\) [\textit{G. Brassard} and \textit{P. GiLLES}, Algorithmics. Theory and practice, London etc.: Prentice-Hall (1988)]. We call such functions almost-constant. From our earlier remarks it follows that \(t\) cannot be constant unless the corresponding problem is feasible. We shall see that in particular cases, both the running time and the communication complexity are less than those of comparable schemes by a factor of \(\log| x|\) (for the same security level). This applies even if the probabilities \(1-| x|^{-k}\) and \(| x|^{- k}\) mentioned earlier are replaced by \(1-2^{-| x|}\) and \(2^{- | x|}\) respectively.
    0 references
    zero-knowledge proofs
    0 references
    Arthur-Merlin black-box IZKP
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references