A dynamic reinsurance theory (Q1199962): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4151113 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Residual risks and hedging strategies in Markovian markets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3773148 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3042109 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A martingale approach to premium calculation principles in an arbitrage free market / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3025997 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3974816 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Markov processes: Ray processes and right processes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Martingales and Stochastic Integrals / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 11:53, 17 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A dynamic reinsurance theory
scientific article

    Statements

    A dynamic reinsurance theory (English)
    0 references
    17 January 1993
    0 references
    The authors consider three variants of surplus (proportional stop-loss) reinsurance: (1) a simple contract, (2) a contract where reinsurance covers a part of the loss between the retention and a multiple, and (3) a combination of proportional stop-loss on the claim severity and proportional stop-loss on the claim number process. In each case they give the evident formulae for the conditional expectation and the conditional variance of the risk retained by the ceding company. Also, in each case, they adapt a result of \textit{N. Bouleau} and \textit{D. Lamberton} [Stochastic Processes Appl. 33, No. 1, 131-150 (1989; Zbl 0743.60069)] to specify the continuously adjusted reinsurface fraction the insurer should use to minimize the variance of the conditional expectation of retained loss. The Bouleau and Lamberton (B\& L) work prescribes conditions for the existence of an optimal hedging strategy between a stock and a contingent claim of a particular form on the stock; their result also gives the expression (in terms of a Carré du Champ operator) for the optimal strategy. The authors demonstrate that these conditions are met when the stock is taken to be the conditional expectation of the (non- proportional) stop-loss reinsurance premium: the optimal strategy for the fraction retained above the retention limit follows immediately from B\& L. A discussion of the numerical evaluation of the various formulae and a number of illustrative examples of each of the three variants completes the paper.
    0 references
    surplus reinsurance
    0 references
    proportional stop-loss reinsurance
    0 references
    retained risk
    0 references
    optimal reinsurance strategy
    0 references
    claim severity
    0 references
    claim number process
    0 references
    conditional variance
    0 references
    conditional expectation of retained loss
    0 references
    optimal hedging strategy
    0 references
    Carré du Champ operator
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers