The local invariant factors of a product of holomorphic matrix functions: The order 4 case (Q1804053): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Matrix realizations of littlewood—richardson sequences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Unsolved problems in matrix and operator theory. II. Partial multiplicities for products / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Multiplication of Schur-Functions and Extensions of <i>p</i> -Modules / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Hall polynomial / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Group characters and algebra / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the partial multiplicities of a product of two matrix polynomials / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rules for the partial multiplicities of the product of holomorphic matrix functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Inequality for Invariant Factors / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 17:58, 17 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The local invariant factors of a product of holomorphic matrix functions: The order 4 case
scientific article

    Statements

    The local invariant factors of a product of holomorphic matrix functions: The order 4 case (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    29 June 1993
    0 references
    Let \(\alpha=\{\alpha_ 1,\dots,\alpha_ n\}\) and \(\beta=\{\beta_ 1,\dots,\beta_ n\}\) be nondecreasing sequences of nonnegative integers (the number \(n\) is fixed). Denote by \(R\) the ring of germs of holomorphic functions in one complex variable \(\lambda\) in a neighborhood of zero. A nondecreasing sequence \(\gamma=\{\gamma_ 1,\dots,\gamma_ n\}\) of nonnegative integers is said to belong to the set \(\Delta_ n(\alpha,\beta)\) if there exist \(n\times n\) matrices \(A\) and \(B\) over \(R\) such that \(\text{det}(A(\lambda)B(\lambda))\neq 0\) for \(\lambda\neq 0\), and \(\{\lambda^{\alpha_ 1},\dots,\lambda^{\alpha_ n}\}\), \(\{\lambda^{\beta_ 1},\dots,\lambda^{\beta_ n}\}\) and \(\{\lambda^{\gamma_ 1},\dots,\lambda^{\gamma_ n}\}\) are the sets of invariant factors for \(A(\lambda)\), \(B(\lambda)\) and \(A(\lambda)B(\lambda)\), respectively. It is a long standing problem to describe \(\Delta_ n(\alpha,\beta)\) in terms of inequalities (called rules) of the form \[ \gamma_{r_ 1}+\gamma_{r_ 2}+\cdots+\gamma_{r_ k}\leq\alpha_{s_ 1}+\alpha_{s_ 2}+ \cdots+\alpha_{s_ k}+\beta_{t_ 1}+\beta_{t_ 2}+\cdots+\beta_{t_ k} \] for certain selections of the index sets \((r_ 1,\dots,r_ k)\), \((s_ 1,\dots,s_ k)\) and \((t_ 1,\dots,t_ k)\). In the full generality the problem is still open, although various particular cases are known. In the present paper the problem is solved explicitly for \(n\leq 4\). The proof is based on the investigation of rules and their properties. Also, new proofs for several previously known results are given.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    product of holomorphic matrix functions
    0 references
    invariant factors
    0 references